Performance Evaluation & Development Planning Flashcards
7 cards from real LPC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Performance Evaluation & Development Planning flashcards as text
A manager rates an employee highly on every dimension because the employee excels at client presentations. Which rating error is this?
Answer: Halo effect
The halo effect occurs when one strong trait inflates ratings across unrelated dimensions.
Which practice best reduces recency bias in an annual performance review?
Answer: Keeping an ongoing log of observed behaviors throughout the year
Documenting critical incidents all year gives the evaluator evidence from the full review period, not just recent weeks.
What distinguishes a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) from a basic graphic rating scale?
Answer: BARS ties each rating point to specific, observable behavioral examples
BARS anchors scale points with concrete behavioral descriptions drawn from critical incidents, improving rating consistency.
Research and best practice suggest 360-degree feedback is most effective when used primarily for what purpose?
Answer: Supporting individual development and self-awareness
When 360 feedback is tied to administrative decisions, raters tend to become less candid, so it works best for development.
A supervisor gives nearly every employee a 3 on a 5-point scale to avoid difficult conversations. This is an example of:
Answer: Central tendency error
Central tendency error clusters ratings around the middle, masking real differences in performance.
In a SMART goal, what does the 'M' require?
Answer: Progress and completion can be quantified or objectively verified
Measurable means there is a clear indicator to track progress and confirm achievement.
What is the primary purpose of a calibration session among managers after ratings are drafted?
Answer: To align rating standards so similar performance receives similar ratings across teams
Calibration reduces rater inconsistency by having managers discuss evidence and apply a shared standard.